One of the most frequently cited and most misused phrases of the Bible is this one: "Judge not." It is often cited as if it were the ultimate rule of ethics. Whenever a person's opinion or practice is said to be "wrong," particularly if the person expressing the opinion is bringing a religion-based evaluation, the opposition will pull the "judge not" card as if the quoting of this piece of scripture trumps everything. But what does the Lord Jesus Christ mean when He gives that command? Is He ruling out all moral discrimination? Is He promoting the universal application of the rule "live and let live" since there is no basis for making ethical determinations anyway? The most useful commentary I have ever read on the phrase is that by Arthur W. Pink. Here it is--
"The capacity of judging, of forming an estimate
and opinion, is one of our most valuable faculties and the right use of it one
of our most important duties. “Why even
of yourselves judge ye not what is right?' (Luke xii, 57) says our Lord; “Judge
righteous judgment' (John vii, 24). If we do not form judgments as to what is
true and false, how can we embrace the one and avoid the other?" (John
Brown). It is very necessary that we have our" senses exercised to discern
[Greek" thoroughly judge"] both good and evil" (Heb. v, 14) if
we are not to be deceived by appearances and taken in by every oily-mouthed
impostor we encounter. It must not be thought that our Lord here forbade us to
act according to the dictates of common prudence and to form an estimate of everything
we meet with in the path of duty, nor even that He prohibited us from judging men's
characters and actions according to their avowed principles and visible
conduct, for in this very chapter He bids us measure men by this rule,
saying, .. by their fruits ye shall know them" (verse 20), and many duties
to others absolutely require us to form a judgment of men, with respect both to
their state and their conduct.
Unless we form estimates and come to a decision
of what is good and evil in those we meet with, we shall be found rejecting the
one and condoning the other. “Beware of
false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are
ravening wolves" (Matt. vii, 15): how shall we heed this injunction unless
we carefully measure every preacher we hear by the Word of God? .. Have no
fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them"
(Eph. v, 11): in order to obey this we are obliged to exercise a judgment as to
what are" works of darkness." .. We command you, brethren, in
the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every
brother that walketh disorderly" (II Thess. iii, 6): this compels us to
decide who is" walking disorderly."~ .. Mark them which cause
divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and
avoid them" (Romans xvi, 17): this requires us to determine who are guilty
of such things. Thus it is abundantly clear that our Lord's prohibition in
Matthew vii, 1, is by no means to be taken absolutely.
There are four kinds of judging which are
lawful and required by the Word: two public and two private. First, ecclesiastical
judgment. This belongs chiefly to the minister, who in preaching God's
Word judges men by admonishing their sins, and in his private dealings he must
be faithful to their souls and rebuke where necessary. The judgment of the
Church is exercised when it decides upon the credibility of the profession of
one applying for membership: so too in the maintenance of discipline and
exclusion of those who refuse to heed its reproofs. Second, civil
government. This pertains to the magistrate, whose office it is to examine
those charged with criminal offences, giving judgment according to the laws of
the land, acquitting the innocent, sentencing those proved guilty. Legitimate private
judgment is first where one man in a Christian manner reprehends another
for his sins, which is required by the Lord (Lev. xix, 17) and second where the
grosser faults of notorious offenders are condemned and others informed thereof
that they may be warned against them. “Judge
not:” that which is here forbidden is unlawful judging of our fellows,
of which we will instance a variety of cases.
First, officiously or magisterially, which
lies outside the prerogative of the private individual: this is assuming such
an authority over others as we would not allow them to exercise over us, since
our rule is to be subject one to another and be clothed with humility" (I
Peter v, 5). We are required both by the
law of nature (which includes rationality and prudence) and the Scriptures to
judge of things, and persons too, as we meet them in the sphere of duty, but to
judge whatever lies outside of our path and province is forbidden. Study to be quiet and to do your own
business" (I Thess. iv, 11): if we give full and proper heed to this
Divine precept we shall have little or no leisure left to pry into the affairs
of others. That which our text prohibits is the passing beyond our legitimate
sphere, that taking upon us to judge that which is not set before us for
judgment, intruding into the circle of others: "let none of you suffer. .
. as a busybody in other men's matters" (I Peter iv 15).
Second, "judge not" presumptuously,
which is done when we treat mere suspicions or unconfirmed rumours as
though they were authenticated facts, and when we ascribe actions to springs
which lie outside the range of our cognizance. To pass judgment on the motives
of another, which are open to none save the eye of Omniscience, is highly
reprehensible, for it is an intrusion upon the Divine prerogative, an invading
of the very office of God. "Who art thou that judgest another man's
servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth" (Romans xiv, 4) places
the Divine ban upon such conduct. A notable example of what is here
interdicted is recorded in Job i. When the Lord commended His servant unto
Satan, saying " Hast thou considered My servant Job, that there is none
like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God and
escheweth evil?" the evil one answered, " Doth Job fear God for
nought? Hast not Thou made an hedge about him, and about his house, and about
all that he hath on every side? Thou hast blessed the work of his hands and his
substance is increased in the land: but put forth Thine hand now, and touch all
that he hath, and he will curse Thee to Thy face" (verses 8-ll),
suggesting that Job only 'served God for the gain thereof. Thus to judge
presumptously the motives of another is devilish !
Third, "judge not" hypocritically.
This form of unlawful judgment was particularly before our Lord on this
occasion, as appears from the verses which immediately follow. The one who is
quick to detect the minor faults of others while blind to or unconcerned about
his own graver sins is dishonest, pretending to be very precise while giving
free rein to his own lusts. Such twofacedness is most reprehensible in the
sight of God, and to all right-minded people too. "Therefore thou art
inexcusable 0 man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest
another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same
things" (Romans ii, I). No matter
what may be his social standing, 'his educational advantages, his religious
profession, the one who is guilty of partiality, who censures in others that
which he allows in himself, is inexcusable and self-condemned.
That even true, yea, eminent, saints are liable
to this grievous sin appears from the case of David, for when Nathan propounded
the instance of the rich man sparing his own flock and seizing the one lamb of
his poor neighbour's, David's anger was greatly kindled and he adjudged the
transgressor as worthy of death, while lying himself under guilt equally
heinous (II Samuel xii, I-II).
Fourth, "judge not" hastily or
rashly. Before thinking the worst of
any person we must make full investigation and obtain clear proof that our
suspicions are well grounded or the report we heard is a reliable one. Before
the Most High brought upon the world the confusion of languages it is said that
He .. came down to see the city and the tower which the children of men
builded" (Gen. xi, 5), as though He would personally investigate their
conduct before He passed sentence upon them. So again, before He destroyed the
cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, He said, "I will go down now, and
see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is
come unto Me" (Gen. xviii, 21). Thus God would teach us that before we
pass sentence in our minds upon any offender we must take the trouble of
obtaining decisive proof of his guilt. We are expressly' commanded" judge
not according to the appearance" (John vIi, 24), for appearances are
proverbially deceptive. Always go to the transgressor and give him an
opportunity to dear himself: "he that answereth a matter before he heareth
it, it is folly and shame unto him" (Prov. xviii, 13).
Fifth, " judge not unwarrantably, which
is to go beyond the rule which is set before us. In God's Word certain things
are commended, certain things condemned, yet there is another class of things
on which the Scriptures pronounce no verdict, which we term" things
indifferent," and to condemn anyone for using such things is to be
"righteous over much" (Eccles. vii, 16). It was for just such
offences that the apostle reproved some of the saints at Rome, who were - sitting in judgment upon
their brethren over different things as
meat and drink." So too he admonished the Colossians who were being
brought into bondage by the" Touch not, taste not, handle not" of
the" commandments and doctrines of men" (ii, 20-23).
The Holy Spirit points out that in such cases
to judge a brother is to .. speak evil of the law" (James iv, II), which
means that he who condemns a brother for anything which God has not proscribed
regards the Law as being faulty because it has not prohibited such things.
"He who quarrels with his brother and condemns him for the sake of
anything not determined in the Word of God, does there by reflect on His Word,
as if it were not a perfect rule" (Matthew Henry).
Sixth, " judge not" unjustly or
unfairly, ignoring everything that is favourable in another and fixing only
on that which is unfavourable. It is often far from being an easy matter to
secure all the materials and facts which in any case are necessary to form a
judgment, yet to pronounce judgment without them is to run a serious hazard of
doing another a cruel injustice. Many a one has rashly condemned another who,
had he known all, might have approved or at least pitied him. Again, it is very
unjust to censure one who has sincerely done his best simply because his effort
falls short of what satisfies us. Much
unjust judgment proceeds from a spirit of revenge and a desire to do mischief.
When David sent his servants to comfort Hanun, the king of Ammon, upon the
death of his father, that king suffered his nobles to persuade him that the
servants of David were spies on an evil mission (II Samuel x): a horrible war
was the outcome-behold how great a fire a little matter kindleth!
Seventh, judge not" unmercifully. While
on the one hand we are certainly not, as far too many today appear to think,
obliged to regard one who holds fundamental error or one who is thoroughly
worldly as a good Christian, yet on the other hand the law of charity requires
us to put the best construction we can on doubtful actions, and never without
proof ascribe good ones to evil principles or motives. God does not require us
to call darkness light or evil good, nevertheless since we are so full of sin
ourselves and so prone to err, we must ever be on our guard lest we call light
darkness and good evil. We are not to go about with our eyes closed nor wink at
sin when we see it, yet it IS equally wrong for us to hunt for something to
condemn and seize upon every trifle and magnify molehills into mountains. We
are not to make a man an offender for a word, nor harbour suspicions where
there is no evidence.
Many a one has condemned another, where no
ground for judgment existed, out of personal jealousy and ill will, which is
doing Satan's work. May the Lord graciously deliver both writer and reader from
all these forms of unlawfully judging others."
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home